🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 189+ reviews
Arts & Craftsβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Thank you 1989 Rubber Stamp

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.8 out of 5(189 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$5
$8.33
Sale
βœ“ at no charge delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Thank You 1989 Rubber Stamp9/28 74

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy shipment
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Thank you 1989 Rubber Stamp

Thank You 1989 Rubber Stamp
9/28 74

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Arts & Crafts products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2345995

Category: Arts & Crafts > Stamping & Embossing > Stamp Ink Refills

Original Price:$8.33 USD

Sale Price:$5 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand simply-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ no-cost distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3829 reviews
AC
Amber Carter
11 months ago Β· Tucson, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
incredible Thank you 1989 Rubber Stamp
After some use, the Thank you 1989 Rubber Stamp is hassle-at no charge to use so no complaints.
29 people found this helpful​
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
No complaints
Honestly, the Thank you 1989 Rubber Stamp performs as expected which is good enough.
22 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase 
2 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Highly advise!
The Thank you 1989 Rubber Stamp was straightforward to set up and start using.
13 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Fresno, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
remarkably happy
the Thank you 1989 Rubber Stamp is practical and it’s fine overall.
42 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Fantastic product
From my experience, the Thank you 1989 Rubber Stamp works fine which is good enough.
44 people found this helpful